Eastern Black
Nightshade Cross-Resistance to Pursuit, Raptor, and Beacon in
Wisconsin
Dean Volenberg*, Dave
Stoltenberg, and Chris Boerboom
Eastern black nightshade is a very
troublesome weed for soybean and pea producers. The weed can
cause substantial yield reductions, but harvest problems and
reduced crop quality are probably of greater importance, even at
low levels of infestation. The contents of eastern black
nightshade berries are released during harvest and cause seed,
soil, and other foreign material to stick together, making
harvest operations difficult. Mature berries often stain soybean
during harvest, reducing grain quality. In addition, immature
berries of eastern black nightshade are similar in size, shape,
and color of pea making separation between species difficult.
During processing the immature berries turn black and reduce pea
quality. Pursuit and Raptor are herbicides commonly used
throughout the Midwest for management of eastern black
nightshade in soybean, and Pursuit is used in pea. Both
herbicides belong to the imidazolinone family and inhibit
acetolactate synthase (ALS).
In 1999, for the first time, the
number of weed species resistant to ALS-inhibiting herbicides
exceeded that of any other herbicide class. Currently, 63 weed
species have evolved resistance to at least one of the four
commercialized classes of ALS-inhibiting herbicides. Within the
north central region of the United States, 16 weed species are
reported to be resistant to ALS-inhibiting herbicides. For more
information on herbicide resistant weeds, visit the
international survey of herbicide-resistant weeds web site at http://www.weedscience.com.
In August 1999, a grower in south
central Wisconsin, reported lack of eastern black nightshade
control in two soybean fields in which Pursuit DG had been
applied postemergence at 1.44 oz / acre and a second time at
0.72 oz / acre. In 1995 and 1997, the fields had been planted in
soybean and Pursuit was applied preemergence at 4 fl. oz / acre
plus pendimethalin. ALS-inhibiting herbicides were not applied
in 1996 or 1998. Pursuit use before 1995 could not be confirmed.
Greenhouse and laboratory
experiments confirmed and quantified resistance of eastern black
nightshade. Whole-plant experiments with three- to four-leaf
stage eastern black nightshade indicated that resistant plants
were 150-, 120-, and 5.9-fold resistant to Pursuit, Raptor, and
Beacon, respectively, compared to the susceptible plants. ALS
enzyme assays determined that the enzyme was 170- and less than
20-fold resistant to Pursuit and Beacon, respectively, and
indicated that resistance was associated with an insensitive ALS
enzyme.
These results indicated that
eastern black nightshade was highly resistant to Pursuit and
Raptor, but was much less resistance to Beacon. This
differential response of resistant eastern black nightshade to
three ALS-inhibiting herbicides can be explained by the chemical
classes in which these herbicides are classified. Pursuit and
Raptor are imidazolinone herbicides, whereas Beacon is a
sulfonylurea herbicide. The selection of eastern black
nightshade cross-resistance to these herbicides occurred in a
field with a history of only three known annual applications of
Pursuit. Reports of eastern black nightshade resistance to
Pursuit or Raptor have also been received from two locations in
west central Wisconsin. The occurrence of eastern black
nightshade resistance has several important implications for
management, especially because this weed affects both crop yield
and quality. Integrated weed management practices that include
alternative herbicides, cultural, and mechanical methods need to
be implemented to manage these resistant eastern black
nightshade populations, and to delay development of additional
resistance problems.
* Graduate Research
Assistant |